|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 26, 2019 16:18:56 GMT -5
Hello Mike, good to hear from you. It does not matter in principle whether the jacket and shirt go up. The in-shot opening and the out-shot opening do not change that the Warren Commission has indicated on the body of the president. And that is way too high and to the right.
I will give more examples of this later. And then you will see that the tie knot is not hit at the indicated place and where the hole is if the tie is knotted. Compare the trajectory(s) with my posted photos in section 2! like the FBI angles! And compare with the Latimer drawing.Concerning tailored fitted shirt and jacket from the president and the governor: The jacket could be moving upwards but the shirt is almost impossible. (I test it at home). (I would to see his undershirt to research).Remark: Nutters often use only the horizontal angel and NOT the vertical angel of the trajectory!Cheers Paul. Later: More to come in follow up about this subject.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 27, 2019 8:01:16 GMT -5
7C: Only hole in the necktie?Was this the only hole in the necktie. Strange,...very strange if the necktie is knotted and a bullet penetrate the necktie! Fabrication,... or another trajectory lower then the incisio. Higher is almost impossible!
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 27, 2019 18:25:15 GMT -5
1A. Inshot angle between 17 and 21 degrees?The HSCA Single Bullet Theory If one were told in 1976 that the HSCA was going to determine that the Warren Commission and Clark panel were wrong, and that the back wound was at the same level as or even slightly below the wound in Kennedy’s throat, one would rightly have concluded that the single-bullet theory had been debunked. Instead, when the HSCA published its final report in 1979, the committee concluded that the theory was still valid. To do this, they proposed that Kennedy was leaning a lot further forward than had previously been presumed. This was doubly surprising since the HSCA had also decided that Kennedy was first hit at Zapruder frame 190, at a point when he is clearly sitting up in his seat.
The Warren Commission, we should remember, concluded he was hit somewhere between frames 210-225 of the Zapruder film, when he was behind the Stemmons Freeway sign, and his forward lean could not precisely be determined. Equally troubling, by moving up the proposed moment of impact, the HSCA put Kennedy closer to the Texas School Book Depository at the time he was shot, and made the angle of descent for the "magic bullet" that much sharper. A quick comparison of Kennedy's position in Zapruder frame 188, 1/9 of a second before the supposed impact, to Kennedy's position in HSCA Exhibit F-46, a drawing of Kennedy leaning forward to the degree required for a non-deflected bullet to pass through his back and neck and then hit Governor Connally, demonstrates that Kennedy was not in the proper position to receive his wounds as proposed. This forces one to wonder if the drawing was simply in error, or if the doctors truly believed the single bullet-theory they were depicting. Some quick measurements show that Kennedy’s neck is bent forward 31 degrees in the drawing, and that the arrow descends at 27 degrees. A bullet on such a trajectory would ascend 4 degrees through Kennedy’s body. As this matches the pathology panel’s analysis of the back wound, it seems clear, then, that they expended some effort on the drawing, and were not just guessing. Which makes it hard to explain why the arrow in the drawing descends at 27 degrees. The angle of descent from the sniper's nest at frame 190, when the HSCA proposed Kennedy was first wounded, was only 24 degrees.
Credits: Pat Speer
www.patspeer.com/chapter11:thesingle-bullettheory
Remark: Could the HSCA determine that the bullet trajectory was (only) 24 degrees?
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 27, 2019 21:03:02 GMT -5
7D. But there are also more and other holes!Like I said before there must be more then one hole in the necktie what not the photo on the lef shows. On the right sight you see a bullet test through the necktie and shirt. Makes a world of difference, hmmmmmm .......
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 27, 2019 21:19:02 GMT -5
1B: They really don,t know!They have no clue and not today.Was the president hit already in Z-190........na no way obstruction by the oak. Was the president hit behind the Stemmons road sign....sure! Was he hit at Z-210.... possible. Was he hit in Z-223, 224, 225... na no way. See also the cramped snipers nest for the angles from the trajectory the shooter could make!
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 28, 2019 4:30:03 GMT -5
7E: Hole in one?
Interesting letter/memo
Where is the undershirt and shorts?
The pristine bullet was not so pristine that a big bullet fragment hit the right side of the necktie knot.
See the hole in the necktie that I published before!
The hole in the coat was 5 3/8 Inch below the top of the colar.
The hole in the shirt 5 ¾ Inch of the top of the colar.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 30, 2019 17:49:31 GMT -5
1c: 21 a 24 degrees problem.
A 17 degree angle does not work. If the bullet wants to hit the tie knot, then the in-shot is much too high. A 10 degree angle is already coming in the right direction, but the shot is still too high and can not be made from the Snipers nest, (elevation problem). But is goes more in the direction of the 2th floor from the DALTEX Bld. In any case, an angle of 23 to 24 degrees vertically is not possible. The shooter could not handle his gun above the boxes in front of him (see earlier posts). . Keep in mind that the elevation he could make sitting on a resting box with the boxes in front of him was only about 7 degrees. Whatever he was standing then kneeling.... the time frame is a big issue when he fired from the TSBD, (8-10 seconds). So if the shooter also have to go from a standing position to a kneeling position he has a real challenge!!! (never seen since 1963 in a reenactment today). O almost forgotten,... Now we have in astanding position shot 1 and 2 fired under angles from 35 and 24 degrees. But a big problem pops up here that was no space to make those two shot in a standing position with a window opening from 13 to 19 inch and boxes stacked everywhere behind and to the right and left from him!
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 30, 2019 18:36:34 GMT -5
1D: 21 a 24 degrees problem. with boxes.
Problems to make the first and the second shot in case with the horizontal and vertical abgles!
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Aug 31, 2019 5:45:39 GMT -5
7F: Frazier vs Silbert on the tie nick!MR. SPECTER -- Does the nick in the tie provide any indication of the direction of the missile? MR. FRAZIER -- The nick is elongated horizontally, indicating a possible horizontal direction, but it does not indicate that the projectile which caused it was exiting or entering at that point. The fibers were not disturbed in a characteristic manner which would permit any conclusion in that connection. MR. SPECTER -- Is the nick consistent with an exiting path? (ASK witch one but he doesn't) MR. FRAZIER -- Oh, yes.MR. SPECTER -- Is there any indication from the nature of the nick as to the nature of the projectile itself? MR. FRAZIER -- No, sir. MR. SPECTER -- Is the nick consistent with a 6.5 millimeter bullet having caused the nick? MR. FRAZIER -- Yes. Any projectile could have caused the nick. In this connection, there was no metallic residue found on the tie, and for that matter there was no metallic residue found on the shirt at the holes in the front. However, there was in the back. So Frazier FBI is pointing to a whole bullet!
And Silbert FBI stated a bullet fragment!
Or was it a just a fabrication/production to get more support for the SBS theory nonsense.Somebody lies if that is a whole bullet hole!
|
|