Post by Arjan Hut on May 1, 2021 10:05:57 GMT -5
503 Preliminary memorandum in the Coleman-Slawson area of the Warren Report
Related:
20 Fourteen minutes recording of Hoover – LBJ phonecall on 23-11-1963
185 The original Pedro Gutierrez Valencia HSCA-interview tape
188 Missing logs and production from the photobase LILYRIC
189 Win Scott's copy of the Mexico City tape(s)
502 Memorandum of December 28, 1963 by Howard Willens
Preliminary memorandum in the Coleman-Slawson area of the Warren Report dated before January 27, 1964.
(National Archives Security Classification Problems Involving Warren Commission Files And Other Records, 1975, p. 53)
COLEMAN, WILLIAM T., JR., (1920-2017) WC counsel; Philadelphia attorney. Coleman investigated every aspect of possible foreign conspiracy regarding JFK's death. Officially he found none. However, when he developed information supporting Sylvia Odio's claim that she had been paid a visit by a "Leon Oswald" when "Lee Harvey Oswald" was supposed to be in Mexico, WC General Counsel J. Lee Rankin became angry, saying, "At this stage we are supposed to be closing doors, not opening them."
(Who’s who in the JFK assassination)
SLAWSON, W. DAVID , WC counsel; Denver attorney. Slawson assisted William T. Coleman in the WC investigation of the possibility that JFK died as a result of a foreign conspiracy. He found no such evidence.
(Who’s who in the JFK assassination)
(THE COLEMAN-SLAWSON REPORT at History Matters)
This 100+ page internal report was not released until the 1990s. It is an internal report on Oswald's foreign activities and the possibility of a foreign conspiracy in the assassination. Warren Commission staff members William Coleman and David Slawson had generally focused in this area, and took a trip to Mexico City in April 1964 to meet with CIA officers there (there is a separate report on that trip). Most of the focus of this report is on possible Soviet involvement in the assassination, though there are shorter chapters on Cuba and anti-Castro Cuban exiles.
The point should be made that even if a sense of honor and duty were not the primary motivating factors in the Warren Commission’s work, simple selfinterest would naturally have induced its members not to try to cover up the existence of a conspiracy if, in fact, they found one. As Commission assistant counsel David Slawson, whose area of responsibility, along with William T. Coleman Jr., was to determine if there was a conspiracy, told me, “We were all motivated to find something unexpected, such as other gunmen or a hidden conspiracy. It would have made us heroes. But these hopes gradually disappeared as the evidence that it was just Oswald rolled in.”
(Bugliosi, Reclaiming History, p. 23)
Larry [Sabato] and Phil [Shenon] say that Oswald’s journey to Mexico City was not fully explored by the Warren Commission. It would be more proper to state that it really was not explored at all by the Commission, as the ARRB-declassified David Slawson/William Coleman report reveals. When one compares that 36-page document with the 300-page Lopez Report, one sees just how empty the Warren Commission version of Mexico City was.
(Jim DiEugenio, The Larry and Phil Show, 2017)
Media specials and articles in places like Politico have also recently recast the spotlight on Oswald’s alleged visit to Mexico City. Ever since 1964, there have been serious issues with the way the Warren Report treated this supposed trip. One problem is that the CIA, which had covert multi-camera photo surveillance on both the Cuban and Russian embassies Oswald visited, could not produce a single photo of alleged assassin Oswald entering or exiting either building—even though he made a total of five combined visits to both places. That would mean the Agency should have ten pictures of Oswald in Mexico City. But as early as November 23, 1963, the CIA reported that it could find no picture of Oswald entering either place.
Noteworthy in this regard is the original rough draft of Warren Commission lawyer David Slawson's report on the Warren Commission visit to Mexico City, which has also been re-released (it was previously released with restrictions in the 90s). Present in this version is a description of the meeting that Slawson, William Coleman and Howard Willens had with station chief Winston Scott. They inquired if Scott had a photo of Oswald at either the Russian or Cuban embassy. Scott replied in the negative. He said this was due to lack of manpower, funding and proper lighting supplements [...]. There is no way to characterize that reply as less than a deception. From the declassified Lopez Report, however, we know that the CIA had full-time coverage of both embassies during operating hours, and that Oswald did not enter either embassy at night (see Oswald, The CIA and Mexico City: The Lopez-Hardway Report [Mary Ferrell Foundation, 2003], esp. pp. 12-46). This information tends to bring Scott into the web of the cover-up about Mexico City, the CIA and Oswald.
(Jim DiEugenio, The Newly Declassified JFK Assassination Files, 2017)
Related:
20 Fourteen minutes recording of Hoover – LBJ phonecall on 23-11-1963
185 The original Pedro Gutierrez Valencia HSCA-interview tape
188 Missing logs and production from the photobase LILYRIC
189 Win Scott's copy of the Mexico City tape(s)
502 Memorandum of December 28, 1963 by Howard Willens
Preliminary memorandum in the Coleman-Slawson area of the Warren Report dated before January 27, 1964.
(National Archives Security Classification Problems Involving Warren Commission Files And Other Records, 1975, p. 53)
COLEMAN, WILLIAM T., JR., (1920-2017) WC counsel; Philadelphia attorney. Coleman investigated every aspect of possible foreign conspiracy regarding JFK's death. Officially he found none. However, when he developed information supporting Sylvia Odio's claim that she had been paid a visit by a "Leon Oswald" when "Lee Harvey Oswald" was supposed to be in Mexico, WC General Counsel J. Lee Rankin became angry, saying, "At this stage we are supposed to be closing doors, not opening them."
(Who’s who in the JFK assassination)
SLAWSON, W. DAVID , WC counsel; Denver attorney. Slawson assisted William T. Coleman in the WC investigation of the possibility that JFK died as a result of a foreign conspiracy. He found no such evidence.
(Who’s who in the JFK assassination)
(THE COLEMAN-SLAWSON REPORT at History Matters)
This 100+ page internal report was not released until the 1990s. It is an internal report on Oswald's foreign activities and the possibility of a foreign conspiracy in the assassination. Warren Commission staff members William Coleman and David Slawson had generally focused in this area, and took a trip to Mexico City in April 1964 to meet with CIA officers there (there is a separate report on that trip). Most of the focus of this report is on possible Soviet involvement in the assassination, though there are shorter chapters on Cuba and anti-Castro Cuban exiles.
The point should be made that even if a sense of honor and duty were not the primary motivating factors in the Warren Commission’s work, simple selfinterest would naturally have induced its members not to try to cover up the existence of a conspiracy if, in fact, they found one. As Commission assistant counsel David Slawson, whose area of responsibility, along with William T. Coleman Jr., was to determine if there was a conspiracy, told me, “We were all motivated to find something unexpected, such as other gunmen or a hidden conspiracy. It would have made us heroes. But these hopes gradually disappeared as the evidence that it was just Oswald rolled in.”
(Bugliosi, Reclaiming History, p. 23)
Larry [Sabato] and Phil [Shenon] say that Oswald’s journey to Mexico City was not fully explored by the Warren Commission. It would be more proper to state that it really was not explored at all by the Commission, as the ARRB-declassified David Slawson/William Coleman report reveals. When one compares that 36-page document with the 300-page Lopez Report, one sees just how empty the Warren Commission version of Mexico City was.
(Jim DiEugenio, The Larry and Phil Show, 2017)
Media specials and articles in places like Politico have also recently recast the spotlight on Oswald’s alleged visit to Mexico City. Ever since 1964, there have been serious issues with the way the Warren Report treated this supposed trip. One problem is that the CIA, which had covert multi-camera photo surveillance on both the Cuban and Russian embassies Oswald visited, could not produce a single photo of alleged assassin Oswald entering or exiting either building—even though he made a total of five combined visits to both places. That would mean the Agency should have ten pictures of Oswald in Mexico City. But as early as November 23, 1963, the CIA reported that it could find no picture of Oswald entering either place.
Noteworthy in this regard is the original rough draft of Warren Commission lawyer David Slawson's report on the Warren Commission visit to Mexico City, which has also been re-released (it was previously released with restrictions in the 90s). Present in this version is a description of the meeting that Slawson, William Coleman and Howard Willens had with station chief Winston Scott. They inquired if Scott had a photo of Oswald at either the Russian or Cuban embassy. Scott replied in the negative. He said this was due to lack of manpower, funding and proper lighting supplements [...]. There is no way to characterize that reply as less than a deception. From the declassified Lopez Report, however, we know that the CIA had full-time coverage of both embassies during operating hours, and that Oswald did not enter either embassy at night (see Oswald, The CIA and Mexico City: The Lopez-Hardway Report [Mary Ferrell Foundation, 2003], esp. pp. 12-46). This information tends to bring Scott into the web of the cover-up about Mexico City, the CIA and Oswald.
(Jim DiEugenio, The Newly Declassified JFK Assassination Files, 2017)