|
Post by Arjan Hut on Feb 25, 2021 10:38:33 GMT -5
493 Record of Reeves Morgan's call to the FBI Falling on deaf ears / Compare:145 Henry McCluskey's letter to the Warren Commission244 FBI record of Cheramie's prognostication of the assassination254 Eugene Dinkin's registered 10-17-1963 letter to RFK331 Six page 22-11-1963 longhand letter containing testimony of Victoria Adams448 Record of SS/FBI interview with Adele EdisenIn the HSCA Final Report, the authors vouch for the Clinton/Jackson witnesses––that is, the people who saw Oswald with Ferrie and Shaw in those two villages in the late summer of 1963 about 115 miles northwest of New Orleans. Oswald first visited two persons in the area, Edwin McGehee and Reeves Morgan. He then was seen by numerous people in line to register to vote. He was then witnessed by at least four people inside the hospital at Jackson applying for a job there. This has all been established beyond a shadow of a doubt by Garrison’s inquiry, the HSCA’s further investigation, and by private interviews done by Bill Davy, Joan Mellen and myself. (Jim DiEugenio, review of On the trail of delusion, part II) Foto's published during Shaw trialMcGEHEE, EDWIN, Oswald witness; Clinton, Louisiana, town barber. McGehee testified at Clay Shaw's trial that in September 1963, during a town registration drive for blacks, Oswald came in for a haircut, showed his USMC discharge card and told him that he was interested in getting a job at the hospital in nearby Jackson. Oswald appeared shocked when McGehee informed him that this was a mental hospital, but continued to express interest in the job. ( Who's who in the JFK Assassination) MORGAN, REEVES, Oswald witness; state representative for Clinton, Louisiana. In September 1963, when eyewitnesses in Clinton say that assassination suspects Clay Shaw, David Ferrie, and Oswald attended a voter-registration drive for blacks, Oswald reportedly stopped and got a haircut from barber Edwin McGehee and expressed interest in securing a job at the mental hospital in nearby Jackson. McGehee referred Oswald to Morgan. Oswald visited Morgan at his home, and Morgan told him he would have a better chance of getting the job if he were a registered voter in the parish. Morgan testified for the prosecution at the Clay Shaw trial, telling the jury that he called the FBI after the assassination and the FBI told him that they already knew about Oswald's visit to Clinton. ( Who's who in the JFK Assassination) Morgan recalled in late August or early September he a car approach his house with the headlights turned on. Morgan's daughter, Mary, was leaving and walked past a young man as he approached her house. To this day Mary has no doubt the young man was "Lee Harvey Oswald." When the young man arrived at the front door he introduced himself to Morgan as Lee Oswald, and was invited inside. Oswald asked Morgan if he could assist him in getting a job as an electrician at the State Hospital. Morgan was surprised that Oswald knew about the vacancy and told him to go to the hospital and fill out an application. He suggested that Oswald take a Civil Service examination, and also said it would not hurt if he were a registered voter. After their conversation, which lasted 20-25 minutes, Oswald was seen by Morgan's son, Van, getting into a black Cadillac driven by a man with white hair. (Amstrong, Harvey & Lee, p. 578) After the assassination, Reeves Morgan, in Jackson for a haircut, talked with McGehee about the man both of them recognized from television as their visitor. “Mr. Reeves, we need to call the FBI,” McGehee said. “I already have,” Morgan said. “They told me they knew Oswald was in the area.” A few days later, the FBI had called and asked what Oswald had been wearing. (Mellen, A Farewell to Justice, p. 212-213)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Mar 5, 2021 14:25:34 GMT -5
494 Small snapshot of black Cadillac in ClintonRelated: 122 More than half of the records of the Garrison inquiry493 Record of Reeves Morgan's call to the FBILee Oswald followed McGehee and Morgan's advice about registering to vote and arrived in Clinton, Louisiana between 9:00 and 10:00 am the next morning. The Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) had been sponsoring a voter registration drive in Clinton and tensions between black and white voters were running high. The following headlines, which appeared in the Baton Rouge States-Times, reflected the mood of the town's people: August 8-"CORE Worker From New York Held in Clinton" August 9-"CORE Members Appear Before Judge" August 10-"CORE Worker Seeks to Quash Charges" August 16-"Trial of CORE Men in Clinton Postponed" August 22-"Tension May be Receding in Clinton" Corrie Collins was the Chairman of the Clinton, Louisiana chapter of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) Collins and a large number of residents in Clinton immediately noticed when a late model black Cadillac pulled up to the curb across the street from the voter registration office on St. Helena Street. A white male exited from the backseat and stood in line at the voter registration office while two men remained in the car. a 1963 black CadillacCollins said, "There weren't many strange cars in Clinton at the time and when one would show up everyone, white and black, would keep an eye on them-so when they drove up I was outside and noticed them, most of the people registering that day was black and every now and then a white would go in, so L.H.O. (Lee Oswald) was a stranger and was easy to spot. ( Harvey & Lee, p 578) Jim Garrison tried to locate the owner of the black Cadillac. Moo Moo learned that G. Wray Gill made his automobile available to David Ferrie “in the scope of his employment.” Shaw’s friend Jeff Biddison owned a similar automobile, which Shaw borrowed on occasion. Banister’s cohort A. Roswell Thompson also drove a black Cadillac. When John Volz scrutinized Shaw’s appointment books for the summer of 1963, nothing demonstrated that he could not have been in Clinton. By now, Francis Fruge had a small snapshot of the black Cadillac that had been taken by a local resident. It pictured four figures, their faces indistinct. (Joan Mellen, A Farewell to Justice, p. 223) St. Helena Street, Clinton, more recentlyBecause the HSCA found the Clinton/Jackson incident so credible, Litwin tries to say such was not the case. Like Lambert, he has to find a way to question the picture Garrison investigator Anne Dischler found. This depicted a car in proximity to the voter registration office with the New Orleans crew in it. Like Lambert, he says it could have been used as a “powerful brainwashing tool.” (Litwin, p. 121) This is ridiculous. First, that picture had to have been taken by one of the bystanders at the time of the voter registration. Under those circumstances, how could it be termed a brainwashing tool? Second, the Clinton/Jackson witnesses did not surface for Jim Garrison. They talked about the incident previously for congressman John Rarick and publisher Ned Touchstone of The Councilor. (Jim DiEugenio, review of On the trail of delusion, part II)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Mar 6, 2021 14:36:28 GMT -5
495 Blow up of the Cadillac photoContinued from:494 Small snapshot of black Cadillac in Clinton[Ann] Dischler again studied the 3 x 5 photograph of the black Cadillac. It was [David] Ferrie at the wheel, she decided, with Oswald beside him. In the back were [Clay] Shaw and another older man, more bulky: two middle-aged, gray-haired men were seated side by side in the backseat. Dischler was persuaded that it was Guy Banister. Back in New Orleans, Garrison’s staff blew up the photograph, but the larger it became, the more distorted were the faces. (Joan Mellen, A Farewell to Justice, p. 225) (Foto by Joan Mellen)Ann Dischler worked as assistant investigator to Lt. Francis Fruge of the Louisiana State Police for the office of District Attorney Jim Garrison of Orleans Parish, Louisiana. She primarily worked in the areas concerning Rose Cheramie and interviews of citizens of Clinton, Louisiana as they concerned the ShawFerrieOswald appearances in that Louisiana town prior to the assassination of President Kennedy.
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Mar 19, 2021 14:09:32 GMT -5
496 Henry Earl Palmer’s big registration bookrelated:438 Sergio Arcachia-Smith's maps of sewer system in Dealey Plaza493 Record of Reeves Morgan's call to the FBI494 Small snapshot of black Cadillac in Clinton “Look,” he said, “this is where Oswald registered.”When Oswald was questioned by registrar of voters Henry Palmer, Palmer asked him if he had any associates or living quarters in the area. As a result of the JFK Act, amid all the documentation released on the incident, we know that Oswald replied with two names: Malcolm Pierson and Frank Silva. When the HSCA retrieved the 1963 roster of treating physicians at the hospital, both those names were on the list. (Davy, p. 107) How could Oswald have known this? One way would have been through Shaw’s well established relationship with CIA asset Dr. Alton Ochsner, who had a connection to the Jackson hospital. (Davy, p. 112) (Jim DiEugenio, review of On the trail of delusion, part II) On May 23, 1967, Fruge and Dischler appeared at Henry Earl Palmer’s office. On this first visit, they intended only to make contact; Dischler had not even brought along her notebook. She did have her tape recorder, which resembled a briefcase. It lay flat on the floor and ran throughout the interview. (...) “Oswald registered to vote up here,” Palmer remarked. He took out his big registration book, opened it, and pointed to a place on one of the pages. “Look,” he said, “this is where Oswald registered.” The name had been erased and written over, but you could still see the big “O” and the space where “Lee H.” had been signed. Over the erasure, another name had been written, but you could make out the pentimento, the shadow of “Oswald,” the truth beneath the surface. “Why was his name erased?” Fruge said. Henry Earl offered no explanation. Instead, he explained how you had to be acquainted with two registered parish voters in order to register. Oswald had mentioned two doctors at East: one was “Dr. Frank Silva,” the medical director of the hospital that summer. He was “living with Dr. Frank Silva,” Oswald had claimed. The other was Dr. Malcolm Pearson, (...) Oswald had produced separation papers from the Navy, Palmer said. On the strength of his having mentioned Dr. Silva, Palmer had permitted him to register. (...) “We’d like to come back tomorrow,” Fruge said, planning to have the registration book copied. (...) Henry Earl PalmerWhen Fruge and Dischler appeared at Palmer’s office the next day, the big registration book had disappeared. Palmer expressed surprise. He offered no explanation. He did not deny that he had said that Oswald had registered. “Nobody can erase that from my memory,” Dischler says today. In the months to come, Fruge and Dischler met with Palmer several more times. Never again did he mention that Oswald had registered successfully. Soon Palmer began to talk as if Oswald had failed to register. “Why eased off on statement in comparison with tape?” Dischler writes in her notebook. (Joan Mellen, A Farewell to Justice, p. 216-218)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Mar 28, 2021 7:27:14 GMT -5
497 Oswald’s East Lousiana State hospital applicationContinued from:496 Henry Earl Palmer’s big registration bookRelated:243 Rose Cheramie's autopsy reportOswald [...] resurfaced at the East [Lousiana State] hospital trying to get a job, but he was making a spectacle of himself. Talking loudly and being obnoxious, he asked the hospital employees what it would take to take Castro down, since he was a Marine and he was involved in getting rid of Castro. Frank Silva, a Cuban doctor that Oswald had used as a reference, heard the conversation and took an immediate dislike to Oswald. Maxine Kemp, the hospital secretary, remembered Oswald filling an application and a year later, after the assassination, looked for the file and found it. When Garrison investigators went there looking to find it, the file had disappeared. ( Vasilios Vazakas, Creating the Oswald Legend – Part 3) Probably the next day, Oswald appeared at the hospital. The receptionist, Bobby Dedon, directed him to the personnel office. He filled out an application for receptionist Maxine Kemp, which another person, Aline Woodside, recalled seing. (Jim DiEugenio, The JFK Assassination, the evidence today, 2018) Inside the hospital, picture by Richard Avedon, 2-15-1963Maxine Kemp, who also worked in personnel, confirmed that Oswald had applied for a job. She would show them the form. Kemp searched all personnel files, “active” and dormant. “It’s missing,” she told Fruge. She, too, remembered the black Cadillac, which had stopped at her father’s Texaco station outside Clinton. Dischler and Fruge interviewed another employee, Aline Woodside, who also said she had seen Oswald’s application. Receptionist Bobbie Dedon identified Oswald from his photograph. [...] Sciambra did his own set of interviews. Reeves Morgan confirmed that Aline Woodside had said she saw an application with Oswald’s name on it. (Mellen, A farewell to justice, p. 222)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Mar 29, 2021 3:58:22 GMT -5
498 The Kassab ReportMore RFK (selection):114 RFK's Marcello-Halfen-Johnson file308 Documentation of Robert Kennedy's private investigation487 The Homme ReportIn the Special Unit Senator files, there are continual references to the “Kassab Report,” a report of an investigation into “alleged ties between the J.F.K. and the R.F.K. assassinations.” The report itself is nowhere to be found. Listed as being in the report are names such as Clay Shaw, Lyndon B. Johnson, John F. Kennedy, Jim Braden, Russell Parsons, and many others of interest to assassination researchers. The report is over 900 pages long, according to page references scattered among these files. Why was such a massive report compiled? Why do so many references to it appear in the SUS files? And why has the full Kassab report been suppressed to this day? (Lisa Pease, The RFK Plot Part II: Rubik’s Cube, The Assassinations, p. 576) RFK-assassination patsy Sirhan Sirhan, right, is accompanied by his attorney, Russell E. Parsons, in Los Angeles in June 1968. (Associated Press)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 4, 2021 13:44:43 GMT -5
499 Original transcript of Victoria Adams testimonyContext:331 Six page 22-11-1963 longhand letter containing testimony of Victoria Adams332 Report of Sandra Styles FBI-interview333 Record of Warren Commission questioning of Dorothy GarnerIn a recent website article titled “Oswald DID NOT Run Down the Stairs” (his emphasis), researcher/author John Armstrong dissects the story of Victoria Adams. He wholeheartedly upholds her account that she descended the back stairs of the Texas School Book Depository immediately after the assassination. But he takes strong exception to statements she made to me that she did not (my emphasis) see employees William Shelley and Billy Lovelady when she arrived on the first floor. Vicki is quoted in her Warren Commission testimony as saying Shelley and Lovelady were there. Yet those two men claimed they remained outside the Depository for some 10 minutes after the assassination. This apparent contradiction between Miss Adams’ prompt descent while claiming she saw two men still outside is what the Commission used to discredit her. Victoria Adams
Armstrong thinks her statement before the Commission—that she saw Shelley and Lovelady—is gospel. He contends her comments of not seeing those men made some 40 years after the fact should be viewed with skepticism and doubt. No one agrees more than I. That doubt is precisely what pushed me to search for the original transcript of her testimony. Did she really say she saw Shelley and Lovelady, or was her testimony doctored as she herself believes? I was looking for the first generation, virtually unalterable, accordion-style paper tape coded by the court stenographer. What I discovered was that this critical tape was missing from the National Archives. A later document revealed it had been destroyed by the Commission, previously on record as promising to preserve such tapes for future inspection. So, we don’t really know what Vicki said. Or didn’t say. ( Barry Ernest Replies to John Armstrong, RE: Victoria Adams)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 9, 2021 9:41:20 GMT -5
500 ONI files located by Lieutenant Commander Florence (Terri) PikeRelated:361 Navy officer Steel's reports on Lee Harvey Oswald470 ONI post-defection investigation473 John Hart Ely Interviews of El Toro Marines482 Rufus Taylor filesThe Office of Naval Intelligence twice informed the Assassination Records Review Board that they had no relevant files. The third attempt by the ARRB staff seemed promising. They met with an ONI team directed by Lieutenant Commander [Florence] Terri Pike, who was somehow belatedly informed on March 7, 1997, that they were tasked to turn over relevant files. Pike dove into the job and had identified where the record collections were held. She reported to the ARRB within two months that her team had already located about 125 cubic feet of documents related to the ARRB requests and that the ONI had identified about 950 cubic feet of records which might be related. Pike told ARRB staffers 4 / 21 / 97, that most of the relevant records were discovered by accident since they were misfiled in boxes they should not have been in. When the ARRB next contacted Pike, she informed them that she had been “relieved of her leadership on the project.” Pike then faced court-martial charges over “fraudulent” travel expenses. The final certification of compliance to the ARRB stated that the ONI was unable to find any relevant file for the Director of ONI from 1959-1964. (Mal Hyman, Burying the lead, p. 437-438) The Washington National Records Center (WNRC) is located in the Suitland Federal Complex in Suitland, Maryland.“Pike then presented us a small written briefing package detailing what they had identified that they are required to do and the process they will use to go about the review. She noted that their first priority was to identify the records collections they need to search, then determining the physical location of the records. Most of these will be at Suitland, she said, but there will be others located in district offices round the country in locations like Chicago, Atlanta, San Francisco, New Orleans, St. Louis and Boston. They have also identified a need to determine standard subject identification codes which should cause a document to be searched, and she concluded by detailing the records disposition procedures within ONI.” ( Bill Kelly, The Railroading of LCDR Terri Pike, JFK Countercoup) ARRB staffers Horne, Barger and Masih meet with LCDR Pike and LCDR Doolittle of ONI. LCDR Pike stated that review of the first 123 cubic feet of ONI records had been completed, and that as a result .8 cubic feet of records (18 distinct files) on defectors had been identified as responsive to the CNO tasking; these records were presented to ARRB staffers at the meeting for cursory review. Completion of declassification review and delivery of the original records to the ARRB was tentatively promised within 2-4 weeks. LCDR Pike also mentioned that approx. 950 cubic feet of additional records had been identified which might be responsive to the topics the ARRB was interested in, and said that review of this material would take approximately 6 months. ( Chronology of Key Events in ARRB-ONI Interface, 21 Apr 1997) ARRB staffer Ron Haron sends letter to Navy OGC (Lt. Col. Finnie, USMC) memorializing results of 19 May meeting between ARRB staff and Navy OGC regarding Navy-wide compliance with JFK Act. This letter formally transmitted ARRB’s expectation of receipt of the .8 cubic feet of ONI records on defectors, and ARRB’s request that ONI find and search the files of the ONI Director at both the time of Oswald’s defection (1959-1960), and at the time of the Warren Commission (1963-64), for assassination-related material. ( Chronology of Key Events in ARRB-ONI Interface, 2 June 1997) ARRB staffer Doug Horne called Terri Pike and requested that ONI look for “119 Reports” covering an alleged ONI investigation of Lee Harvey Oswald’s October, 1959 defection to the Soviet Union. LCDR Pike accepted the tasking, but ARRB never received any feedback on its results. ( Chronology of Key Events in ARRB-ONI Interface, 19 Aug 1997) From the perspective of a JFK Assassination researcher, I don’t know Terri Pike, but just from reading these records she’s a hero of mine. And I want to know more, especially what became of her after she was railroaded by the military brass for doing her job. She should get a medal for what she did. From a review of the documents, it is clear that Pike was removed from her job, reprimanded, demoted, and wrongly disciplined under trumped up charges. Her career was effectively ended because she took the initiative to retrieve and catalogue ONI records pursuant to the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Act. Another researcher who read the documents independently concluded, “She was disciplined and (probably) kicked out of the Navy solely because she traveled to ONI document storage holding locations and retrieved records, rather than just rely on records at her location in DC. She seems to be a genuine American hero, trying to do the right thing and getting guillotined for it. This is a shocking case that exhibits the level of abuse that can occur in ONI when that office wants to stonewall and hide records. It is also instructive to see the massive quantities of records that were destroyed prematurely and improperly, according to the records.” ( Bill Kelly, The Railroading of LCDR Terri Pike, JFK Countercoup)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 15, 2021 9:29:07 GMT -5
501 Letter of February 7, 1964 from Workers Defense League to the Warren CommissionPossibly related (selection):11 Page 17 from Oswald's address book80 Volume 5 of Office of Security-file on Oswald267 The source of Oswald's funds363 Oswald - Thornley correspondenceSource: National Archives Security Classification Problems Involving Warren Commission Files And Other Records, 1975, p. 53 ( A 1970 article to illustrate the activities of the WDL, AH): "To the Editors: The Workers Defense League, founded in 1936 by Norman Thomas and his friends in the labor movement, has concerned itself with protecting the legal rights of workers. In recent years its emphasis has evolved around the rights of workers in the military. In 1955, Rowland Watt’s study, “Draftee and Internal Security,” blasted then prevalent Armed Services practices and compelled substantial reforms, literally within weeks after its publication. Today the Workers Defense League is once again deeply involved in the defense of GIs. As an example of its efforts (and successes), Workers Defense League cooperating attorneys defended those accused in the Fort Dix stockade rebellion of June 5, 1969. The Fort Dix rebellion was a warning signal that young Americans are unwilling to yield their civil and human rights when they don a uniform. Terry Klug, one of the key figures charged by the Army, was acquitted of riot and arson. He was placed in the Fort Dix stockade because he had been absent from Fort Bragg from June, 1967, until January, 1969. While away, he was active in Europe organizing and promoting RITA (Resistance In The Armed Forces). Believing that the struggle was at home and not abroad, he voluntarily surrendered. While en route back to Fort Bragg under military orders, he was taken into custody at Kennedy Airport. His statement to the press in opposition to governmental policies and military practices was introduced into evidence at his court-martial under the strong objection of his Workers Defense League attorneys, Rowland Watts and Jesse Moskowitz. Rowland Watts argued his appeal on April 9, 1970, before the Court of Military Review in Washington, which reversed Terry’s conviction of desertion on September 10. Terry is very fortunate. He is now out. However, he did serve seventeen months at hard labor on the original charge of desertion. His conviction of AWOL carries a maximum sentence of one year’s confinement. The Workers Defense League has also filed briefs with the Court of Military Review for Jeff Russell and Bill Brakefield, other members of the “Fort Dix 38.” If necessary, their cases will be brought before the Court of Military Appeals and the Supreme Court. Most of the other men incarcerated by the Army are the unfortunate ones. There were 76,320 courts-martial in the Army alone in 1969 with a conviction rate of 94 percent. Few defendants had trained civilian counsel. Ninety percent of them were in stockades and brigs on charges of AWOL. Their average age is nineteen. The clash between a growing militancy among GIs and the Army bureaucracy means that more and more men are brought to trial. These men need your help. Workers Defense League cooperating attorneys contribute the equivalent of $300,000 in free legal services each year, but so much more is needed, for depositions, transcripts, travel, investigations, phone, mail, and other out-of-pocket expenses. I urge you to help. Please mail your check to the Workers Defense League, 112 East Nineteenth Street, New York City 10003." ( Murray Kempton, The New York Review, November 5, 1970 issue) WDL promotional campaign, c. 1940
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 18, 2021 14:08:03 GMT -5
502 Memorandum of December 28, 1963 by Howard Willens See also:250 Dori Dressander-J. Lee Rankin correspondence fileMissing: Memorandum of December 28, 1963 by Howard Willens setting forth proposed procedures for the Commission. ( National Archives Security Classification Problems Involving Warren Commission Files And Other Records, 1975, p. 53) Howard P. Willens (born May 27, 1931) is a lawyer and author who served as Assistant Counsel to the Warren Commission from December 1963 to September 1964. In that role, Willens worked with the lawyers and agents conducting the investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, reviewed the lawyers’ memoranda for submission to members of the commission, and edited the material that became the Report of the commission. His book, History Will Prove Us Right: Inside the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy, published in 2013, relied on previously undisclosed primary sources to document the methods and strategies underlying the “most massive, detailed and convincing piece of detective work ever undertaken.” ( Wikipedia, retrieved 4-18-21) Howard Willens, right, and fellow Warren Commissioner investigator David Belin at the Texas School Book Depository in March 1964.
I agree that my journal comments about the CIA were naïve, to say the least. As you probably know, the CIA officials who were designated to work closely with the Warren Commission later testified that they personally did not know about the assassination plots being considered by the agency during the 1960-63 period. Deputy Director for Plans Richard Helms, of course, did know about the plots and did not tell the truth to the Warren Commission when he testified. It is clear that the CIA “did have an axe to grind” during our investigation. ( Howard Willens 2019 interview, JFKfacts)
|
|