|
Post by Arjan Hut on Sept 17, 2020 12:55:00 GMT -5
417 The Mannlicher Carcano parcel post receipt Related:6 The Oswald Letter a.k.a the Hosty Note 9 The steel-jacketed 30.06 bullet retrieved from Edward Walker's house 91 Record of Ellsworth questioning Oswald And this (see 416) was not the only problem with the records provided by the Post Office. The receipt for delivery of the firearm to Oswald was never produced, despite the fact that postal regulations for 1963 also mandated the retention of firearms delivery records for four years. James Hosty, 1924-2011, FBI CI-agent in Dallas, investigating illegal gun-sales, got in touch with Oswald the day before Oswald ordered a rifle using an alias.What happened to the parcel post receipt for the gun, and and more significantly, who signed it? This receipt, showing the signature of the person who received the rifle, should have been readily available to postal inspector Holmes and the Warren – by law. More than a postal requirement, the receipt would also have served as the conclusive evidence that placed the assassination weapon in Oswald's hands. How could the government have passed up such a golden opportunity to make its case – indeed, have gone out of its way to miss such a chance by deviating from its own regulations – unless, perhaps, by some unstated logic, there was something to be gained by this deviation? (Ray and Mary LaFontaine, Oswald talked, p. 168)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Sept 20, 2020 12:47:23 GMT -5
418 "The Arnold Film"Compare:111 “The Ralph Simpson movie”135 Beverly Oliver's Super 8 Yashica color movie of the assassination 201 Over half of the Doyle film Gordon L. Arnold, a former Dallas soldier, said he was stopped by a man wearing a light-colored suit as he was walking behind a fence on top of the grassy knoll minutes before the assassination. Arnold, now an investigator for the Dallas Department of Consumer Affairs, was not called by the Warren Commission and has not been interviewed by the House Assassinations Committee. Arnold said he was moving toward the railroad bridge over the triple underpass to take movie film of the presidential motorcade when “this guy just walked towards me and said that I shouldn’t be up there.” Arnold challenged the man’s authority, he said, and the man “showed me a badge and said he was with the Secret Service and that he didn’t want anybody up there.” Arnold then retreated to the front of the picket fence high up on the knoll just to the west of the pergola on the north side of Elm Street. Gordon Arnold As the Presidential Limousine came down Elm towards the triple underpass, Arnold stood on a mound of fresh dirt and started rolling his film. He said he “felt” the first shot come from behind him, only inches over his left shoulder, he said. “I had just gotten out of basic training,” Arnold said, “In my mind live ammunition was being fired. It was being fired over my head and I hit the dirt.” Arnold, then 22, said the first two shots came from behind the fence, “close enough for me to fall down on my face.” He stayed there for the duration of the shooting. His fence position, under the shade of a tree, may have locked away his story for 15 years as the Warren Commission and later other assassination researchers scanned photographs and movie footage of Dealey Plaza for witnesses to the shooting. Arnold showing where he stood
The first two shots that Arnold heard did not come from the Texas School Book Depository Building because “you wouldn’t hear a whiz go over the top of your head like that.” He said, “I say a whiz — you didn’t really hear a whiz of a bullet, you hear just like a shock wave. You feel it . . . You feel something and then a report comes right behind it. It’s just like the end of a muzzle blast.” He said he heard two shots, “and then there was a blend. For a single bolt action, he had to have been firing darn good because I don’t think anybody could fire that rapid a bolt action.” “The next thing I knew someone was kicking my butt and telling me to get up.” Arnold said, “it was a policeman. And I told him to go jump in the river. And then this other guy - a policeman - comes up with a shotgun and he was crying and that thing was waving back and forth. I said you can have everything I’ve got. Just point it someplace else.” Arnold took his film from the canister and threw it to the policeman. “It wasn’t worth three dollars and something to be shot. All I wanted them to do was to take that blooming picture (film) and get out of there, just let me go. That shotgun and the guy crying over there was enough to unnerve me for anything.” Two days later, Arnold was on a plane reporting for duty at Fort Wainwright, Alaska. He hadn’t given police in Dealey Plaza his name and never told his story to authorities, “because I heard after that there were a lot of people making claims about pictures and stuff and they were dying sort of peculiarly. I just said, well, the devil with it, forget it. Besides, I couldn’t claim my pictures anyway; how did I know what were mine?” (Earl Golz, Dallas Morning News, 27th July, 1978)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Sept 23, 2020 12:48:15 GMT -5
419 Farmer's Branch Kennedy threat tape
Compare:201 Over half of the Doyle film 295 What captain Martin knew Discussions: the mysterious Jack Martin filmYet another curious event was alleged to have occured on the night of October 1, 1963, though the source is suspect. At a study group in [Dallas suburb] Farmer's Branch, a man was reported to have said something in a taped conversation about the Cubans “taking care” of Kennedy when he came into town. The story was told to Weisberg by the Castorrs and, as they explained, was being promoted by Nelson Bunker Hunt, Dallas Police lieutenant George Butler, and Gen. Edward Walker, all ultra-right-wingers who themselves had questions to answer about the assassination. The alleged taped statement has the appearance of a red herring. ( Oswald talked, p. 272) Mr. Castorr: We were called one evening to witness this film in Lakerock at someone's home and Lt. Butler and his wife were there. Mrs. Castorr No. No. Honey. This was not a film. This was the recording that was played by a man in Irving from the Farmers Branch meeting. We were just listening to what the man said. These Cubans -- it takes so long to say anything and the film runs for several hours. The tapes... The tapes. Weisberg: When did you listen to the tapes. Sometime after the meeting... Mr. C: It was quite a while after that... Mrs. C: I think it was a year after the assastination. A photograph showing the Colonel and his wife visiting Buckingham Palace, according to Gregg Parker who found it.
W: Whose tape was it? I'm trying to think of the individuals... Mrs. C: [crossed out] and he was the coordinator of the John birch Society in Dallas at the time... W: Oh. I know which one and I'm trying to think of it now... Mrs. C: George Butler was listening to that tape. Mr. C: Was Walker there too? W: Was this to learn someting about the assassination? I heard that tape kind of stirs you a little bit. threatening -- What was the reaction at this meeting -- the victriol from this Cuban when he spoke about (?) Mrs. C: The amazing thing was that living in Dallas, people were not too excited about things that were happening. Mrx. C: That's right. Joseph Brennan. W: He arranged the money for the ad? Mr. C: Yes he did and that's how I got Buffer to contribute. That's how H.L.gets into the act. W: Did anybody at that meeting or anybody you know or yourself have any suspicions about these Cubans and the assassination. Their possible involvement. Mr. C: None other than the two birds who came to that Farmers Branch meeting that night and who said that they were going to get rid of Kennedy one way or another.. That came in on the tape. They were of the opinion that evening...this was a reflection on their part as to how Kennedy had let them down in Miami at that speech at the stadium, you know, about the Bay of Pigs deal... W: He made another speech in Miami later before the assassination. W: Do you remember which of these two men it was who said he had a Brown Belt in Carate., and that one way or another he would get that tape? Mr. C: Yeah. I can picture him. He's a big chunky and black-haired. I don't know whether he had a mustache or not (...) Mrs C: there were two Cuban men -- maybe there were three. W: Were you both at the Farmers Branch. Mrs. C: No. No. My husband was in Europe. I was on the stage Mr. C: You were with Johnnie Martino that night. W: That's right. Explain that. How would they know who was threatening if they heard it later Mrs.C: The as names of those people I did not know. W: Nester Castrolonis (?) was the main speaker A man named Haynes was also introduced. Also, another man -- Cubans accused Yeah, he said -- do Mr. C: He was the Brown dove? W: Well, I don't know about the brown dove -- I just heard that today Mrs. C: Yes. He's the one that made the threat. He was all finished speaking when he found out there had been a tape made. Mr. C: Roderfer made the tape? Mrs. C: I don't know, dear. Mr. C: And the other funny guy who was always there made a tape. Three tapes. Mrs. C; On that particular meeting, I don't think that Roderfer was there. It was a man from Irving who made that tape. W: This was in a bank or a home? Mrs. C: A bank -- Farmers Branch. You see, they had this little study club would have an outstanding speaker, I believe they met once a month.. W: Do you remember their name? Mrs. C: The name of the organization? I think it was the Farmers Branch Study Club. ( Transcript of taped interview with Colonel Castorr and his wife Trudy, by Harold Weisberg, 1-30-68) Farmer's Branch, 1962, impression. From: Farmers Branch, Texas: A History in Pictures.Father Walter J. McChann, who was active in a Cuban Catholic committee concerned with the welfare and relief of Cuban refugees in Dallas, told the Secret Service about a Colonel Caster who was associated with the committee. Father McChann said that Colonel Caster was a retired Army officer who seemed to be "playing the role of an intelligence officer in his contacts with the Cubans" and that he seemed to be "more interested in their political beliefs than in their economic plight or their social problems in the new country." (CE 2943) Mrs. C. L. Connell, a volunteer worker in the committee, also mentioned the Colonel. She told the FBI on November 29, 1963 that "General Walker and Colonel (FNU) Caster, a close acquaintance of Walker, have been trying to arouse the feelings of the Cuban refugees in Dallas against the Kennedy administration" in speeches before Cuban groups in the Dallas area "in recent months." (CE 3108) (Neither the FBI nor the Warren Commission found that news of sufficient interest to warrant an interview with the Colonel.) (Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p. 385)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Sept 24, 2020 12:38:10 GMT -5
420 One possibly very very revealing FBI informant file Context:6 The Oswald Letter a.k.a The Hosty Note86 Army intelligence records on Fort Hood arms theft 87 Army intelligence records on Captain George Nonte 93 Identity of Fort Hood gun deal informant 94 Fourteen page FBI document on Donnell Whitter
There was no such file, according to the response from Oliver (“Buck”) Revell[O]ne more FBI Trunk Street curiosity has recently come to light. The Bureau destroyed the only file that would have identified the informant on the arrest of Whitter and Miller. Bill Adams' FOIA request of 1994 to the Dallas FBI field office for the file on the Whitter-Miller investigation was denied. There was no such file, according to the response from Oliver (“Buck”) Revell*. Using Whitter-Miller trial testimony as proof of the existance of the file, Adams appealed to the Justice Department. He was then told that the file had been 'routinely destroyed' in December 1977. Just four months earlier, in August, researcher Mark Allen had written a memo to the House Select Committee suggesting a connection between John Elrod's report to the FBI and the Whitter-Miller incident. The FBI did not provide Adams with a copy of the required report explaining the reason for the destruction. There is no routine destruction of files containing informant information, according to the National Archives. Moreover, as James Lesar of the Washington Assassination Archives and Research Center noted, fourteen years is not a routine holding period for the small number of FBI files occasionally destroyed. (Ray and Mary La Fontaine, Oswald Talked, p. 432, 1996) Oliver (“Buck”) Revell
* He served for five years as an Officer and Aviator in the U.S. Marine Corps, leaving active duty in 1964 as a Captain. In September 1987, Mr. Revell was placed in charge of a joint FBI/CIA/U.S. military operation (Operation Goldenrod) which led to the first apprehension overseas of an international terrorist. He was Special Agent in Charge (SAC) of the Dallas Division of the FBI at the time of his retirement in September 1994. He retired with the rank of Associate Deputy Director. In 1989, President George H. W. Bush awarded Mr. Revell the Presidential Distinguished Senior Executive Award and in 1990 the Presidential Meritorious Senior Executive Award. He wrote a book entitled, A G-Man’s Journal: A Legendary Career in the FBI – From the Kennedy Assassination to the Oklahoma City Bombing. ( Jinsa.org)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Sept 25, 2020 1:22:17 GMT -5
421 Mary Hall's 1963 statement to the Dallas PoliceMary Hall worked for E. Willis Fashion Co. on the fifth floor of the Dal Tex Building. Her sewing machine was near a window facing Houston St., between her building and TSBD. Before going on to tell what she saw that day, she told the HSCA, the day before, some men had spoken to her boss. She overheard one of them say, "words to the effect that they were determining the route of the motorcade" In 1977, she testified that on the morning of the 22nd, sometime between 9:30a and 10:30a, she saw an old type station wagon park on Houston St. next to TSBD. It had the words "Honest Joe" on the side. A young man got out and took a package about 5 feet long, 5-8 inches wide into a side door of the building. Her boss told her to make a statement to the police. She said she did. There is no 1963 record of her statement. (For more, see: Michael Capasse, Honest Joe On the Side) "Mary Frances Hall Davis (R) with her younger sister Yvonne (L) - from my research. Both deceased, unfortunately. She was the 1/2 sister of Irma Jean Davis Vanzan and was with Irma in DP on 11/22/63. She was 28yo at the time.", writes Linda Giovanna Zambanini, who was so kind to send in this picture. Thank you Linda!
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Sept 26, 2020 10:09:16 GMT -5
422 Report of interview with mother of Philip Geraci III
(Philip Geraci was a teenager who would visit Carlos Bringuiers' Casa Roca-store in New Orleans. He got to know Bringuier, and was interested in the Cuban cause. Geraci was in the store with his friend Vance, when Lee Harvey Oswald came in. When the teenager testified in New Orleans in April of 1964, his mother accompanied him. Apparently, his mother was also interviewed seperately. The report of this interview is missing, source: FINAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL STUDY COMMISSION ON RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS OF FEDERAL OFFICIALS) Context:62 FBI Agent John L. Quigley's interrogation notes 86 Army intelligence records on Fort Hood arms theft 201 Over half of the Doyle film389 Tape recording of plotters meeting in New Orleans Mr. LIEBELER - Now tell us the conversation that you and Lee and Vance and Carlos had, the best you can recall it. Mr. GERACI - Well, Carlos and me and Vance were kind of talking among ourselves, and he came in and said, "Excuse me" and, you know, he acted a little nervous and things like that. He asked, " Is this the Cuban headquarters, Cuban exile headquarters?" And, "Are you a Cuban exile?" You know, the way I acted when I first went in there. Just asked him a few questions, was he a Cuban exile, and Carlos said yes. He asked him some questions like was he connected with the Cosa Nostra, La Cosi Nostra. Mr. LIEBELER - Who asked that? Mr. GERACI - Oswald; he asked that. Mr. LIEBELER - Of Carlos? Mr. GERACI - Yes; and Carlos said no, he wasn't. Oswald then asked where was his headquarters--in Miami? And Carlos said yes; and he said--let's see---and then Oswald asked, said something like, "It is kind of exciting meeting someone"--I don't know if he said exciting--but he expressed something like that. He said, you know, he expressed wonder or something like that at meeting somebody who was a real Cuban exile, you know, someone who is really trying to do something to help free Cuba and all that. He didn't really say much. In the papers they said he tried to join and all that. That must have been later; because this was-- Mr. LIEBELER - He didn't do that when you were there? Mr. GERACI - No. This was his first visit. As far as I can make out, it must have been, and he asked a few questions like that. Carlos just answered real simply and all that, he didn't go into any big speeches, you know, with them, like he did for me and Vance, just answered his questions simply. Then when the man came in with the broken radio, Carlos left, and that left Oswald, me, and Vance by ourselves. Then, well, we asked--you know, we were a little interested in guerrilla warfare ourselves and things like that, and he said, well, he was an ex-marine, said he was in the Marines once. He said he learned a little bit about that stuff, and he said a few things about guerrilla warfare I remember, like he said the way to derail a train was to wrap chain around the ties of the track and then lock it with a padlock and the train would derail. He said the thing he liked best of all was learning how to blow up the Huey P. Long Bridge. He said you put explosive at each end on the banks and blow it up, and that leaves the one column standing. And he said how to make a homemade gun and how to make gunpowder, homemade gunpowder. He just went into those real simply. He didn't really, you know, tell us how to do it or anything, just said like if you want to make a homemade gun, you know, do something like you know, the thing you pull back [demonstrating] and it goes forward, like on one of the pinball machines. He just s aid something like that. He didn't really go into detail or anything. We didn't ask him. And by this time Carlos came back from the other guy, and came back, and he was listening, and, well, that is about all. Oh, there was one important thing. Oswald said something like that he had a military manual from when he was in the Marines, and he said he would give it to me, and I said, "That is all right. You don't have to. You can give it to Carlos." He said, "Well, OK, he will give it to Carlos next time he comes." And after that--well, everybody left. That is as far as I can make out. Mr. LIEBELER - Do you remember---- Mr. GERACI - And he said he was going to come back later and give Carlos this military manual from when he was in the Marines. Mr. LIEBELER - And was he going to give this to Carlos for Carlos' benefit, or was he----- Mr. GERACI - For Carlos' benefit, I guess, Carlos' or the Cuban exiles'. Mr. LIEBELER - Did you hear any conversation about training guerrillas to oppose Castro? Mr. GERACI - No. He didn't say anything about being an expert rifle shooter, never said anything about going to Russia or joining or training or anything like that. Mr. LIEBELER - Well, was there a conversation concerning the training of anti-Castro troops or guerrillas to oppose Castro? Mr. GERACI - No; that must have been later, maybe when he came back some other time. Mr. LIEBELER - Now were you present at all times while Oswald was there? Mr. GERACI - We got there before he did and we left at the same time he did. Mr. LIEBELER - So, as far as you know, there wouldn't have been any opportunity for Oswald and Carlos to talk among themselves where you wouldn't have heard what they said? Mr. GERACI - That is right; because we were there all the time. Mr. LIEBELER - And you have no recollection that Oswald told Carlos that he wanted to help train anti-Castro guerrillas to fight against Castro? Mr. GERACI - None at all; none that I remember. ( Warren Commission testimony of Philip Geraci III)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Oct 2, 2020 10:28:30 GMT -5
423 At least dozens of FBI docs concerning threats to the President Related:6 The Oswald Letter a.k.a the Hosty Note 36 Withheld Regis Kennedy files 62 FBI Agent John L. Quigley's interrogation notes 77 File cabinet containing records that appeared to be names and activities of Cuban sympathizers149 One FBI 17-11-1963 Teletype 168 Six boxes of FBI files on the Fair Play for Cuba Committee203 New Orleans FBI security file on Oswald 244 FBI record of Cheramie's prognostication of the assassination 252 FBI follow-up on names mentioned by Eugene Dinkin 312 New Orleans FBI informant file on Oswald315 DeBrueys' 25 October 1963 report on Oswald and the FPCC 330 Contemporary FBI investigation of Chicago group threat 420 One possibly very very revealing FBI informant fileCurt Gentry told Mary [La Fontaine] in the fall of 1994 that William Sullivan had revealed to him that he knew something about Oswald being an informant. Though Gentry continued to press him for more information on the assassination, Sullivan was still putting him off when he died in a hunting accident. (…) The former FBI man was cooperating with Gentry on what would be his widely admired J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets (1992). Among the book's revelations: the bureau “destroyed in the hours after Kennedy was assassinated” some dozens, perhaps even over a hundred” documents concerning threats on the life of the President, “which the FBI had failed to report to either the Secret Service or the Kennedys – and certainly would never mention to the Warren Commission.” (Ray and Mary La Fontaine, Oswald talked, p. 433) On November 9, 1977, days before he was to testify to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, twenty minutes before sunrise, sixty-five-year-old Sullivan was walking through the woods near his retirement home in Sugar Hill, New Hampshire, on the way to meet hunting companions. Another hunter, Robert Daniels, Jr., a twenty-two-year-old son of a state policeman, using telescopic sight on a .30 caliber rifle, said he mistook Sullivan for a deer, shot him in the neck, and killed him instantly. Sullivan directed Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) domestic intelligence operations from 1961–1971. Sullivan was forced out at the FBI at the end of September 1971 due to disagreements with FBI director J. Edgar Hoover. (Wikipedia, retrieved 10-2-20)Nor were these the only documents destroyed in the hours after Kennedy was assassinated. Estimates vary from a few to dozens, perhaps even a hundred. Estimated vary from a few to dozens, perhaps even over a hundred. It is possible, even probable, that included among them were the Jose Aleman interview reports, in whch the Cuban exile told the special agents Davos and Scranton that the Mafia boss Santos Trafficante, Jr. had predicted, “No Jose, he is going to be hit.” If so, they were just one of a number of threats the FBI had failed to report to either the Secret Service or the Kennedys – and certainly would never mention to the Warren Commission. (Gentry, J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets, p. 547)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Oct 4, 2020 10:53:15 GMT -5
424 Negative and print of the picture on Oswald's DoD-card Related:108 Oswald's military ID-card 129 Photo showing Oswald at Powers trial When the [U.S. Marine] Corps finally responded to Ray's detailed FOIA on the Oswald card, the regulations simply raised more doubts about its origin. They provided, for example, that the negative and one print of the photograph taken for the card should be retained in the permanent file of the recipient. However, Oswald's clearly was not – at least, not by the Marine Corps. Pictured above is Oswald’s DoD 1173 card…the problem is, he should not have had one, according to the La Fontaines. They are mainly issued for dependents of active duty, retired, and reserves to access bases, meals, commissaries, and medical services.
On October 10, 1963, the CIA in Mexico City had cabled the Office of Naval Intelligence, requesting the navy's most recent picture of Lee Henry [sic] Oswald. ONI never sent the picture, but after the assassination of President Kennedy, it produced an envelope addressed to the CIA and containing Oswald's 1956 induction photo. Had the Marine Corps followed it's own procedure in issuing the DD form 1173 to Oswald, it would have had a print and a negative of the photograph on the card in its files. None has ever been produced and the photos on the card appears not to have been taken when he was in the Marines – he certainly doesn't have a Marine-style haircut, even though his passport photo, taken the same week the card was issued, shows a decidedly short-haired Oswald. Nor was the DoD card laminated as it should have been, per 1959 Marine Corps regulations. Like the [Gary Francis] Powers card, Oswald's is unlaminated. From these inconsistencies with normal Marine procedure, it would appear that the Oswald card, like Powers', may have been issued by another U.S. government agency. (Ray & Mary La Fontaine, Oswald talked, p. 77-78)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Oct 6, 2020 11:44:56 GMT -5
425 The source of “Oswald's” $189 check Compare 65 Repair ticket 18374266 Records of Ruth Paine wiretap 296 Records of an 21-11-63 Irving Robbery If it was the real Oswald, who was the source of the check for $189?
Obviously the Commission has inferred (but not established) that Oswald was aware of the exact route early enough for premeditation, as manifested by his return to Irving. It does appear that Oswald's visit on Thursday evening without notice or invitation was unusual. But it is not clear that it was unprecedented. An FBI report dealing with quite another matter—Oswald's income and expenditures—strongly suggests that Oswald had cashed a check in a grocery store in Irving on Thursday evening, October 31, 1963 (CE 1165, p. 6); the Warren Commission decided arbitrarily that the transaction took place on Friday, November 1. (WR 331) Neither Oswald's wife nor Mrs. Ruth Paine, both of whom were questioned closely about the dates and times of Oswald's visits to Irving during October and November, suggested that he had ever come there —with or without prior notice—on a Thursday. It is possible, though implausible, that Oswald came to Irving on Thursday, October 31, 1963, solely to cash a check and then returned to Dallas without contacting his wife or visiting the Paine residence. More likely, Marina and Mrs. Paine forgot that visit or, for reasons of their own, preferred not to mention it. Either way, it is clear that Oswald's visit to Irving on Thursday night, November 21, may not have been unprecedented. (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p. 37) 2333 West Shady Grove, Irving, the location of Hutch's Supermarket The Grocer
Leonard Hutchison, proprietor of a supermarket in Irving, Texas, testified that Oswald had made purchases in his store from time to time early on weekday mornings: once he had come on a Wednesday evening, accompanied by a woman believed to be Marina Oswald and a second, elderly woman, and during the first week of November 1963, Oswald had tried to cash a personal check made out to him for $189. (WR 331-332) Having considered this testimony, the Commission concluded that there were "strong reasons for doubting the correctness of Hutchison's testimony." Oswald was not known to have received a check for $189 from any source; he was actually in Dallas at the times Hutchison claimed he was in his store at Irving; both Marina and Marguerite Oswald denied ever having been in Hutchison's market. The reasoning appears to be valid and to justify the assumption that Hutchison had confused a different customer with Oswald. But one difficulty is that the customer stopped coming into the store after the assassination and has not reappeared to this day or come forward to assert his identity. Another difficulty is that Hutchison's story received corroboration from a man who did not rate mention in the Warren Report: Clifton Shasteen. Shasteen is the proprietor of a barber shop in Irving, situated not far from Hutchison's supermarket. Shasteen testified that Oswald had come to the barber shop several times to have his hair cut. On some occasions he had been accompanied by a boy about fourteen years of age. One time the boy had criticized American policy, voicing pacifist and socialist views. As for Oswald, Shasteen testified: The only time I remember seeing him, you know, other than just going in the grocery store across the street, Mr. Hutchison's food market, and I was down at thedrugstore one night, down at Williamsburg's and he was in there. . . . And, why I remembered seeing him in there, I knew I couldn't understand his wife, and that was before—I believe it was before she had her baby. The best I remember she was pregnant. . . .That's the only time I had ever saw her, that I remember. You know, she may have come to the grocery store with him but I didn't pay any attention. Sometimes there were two women with him. ... (10H 311) No wonder Shasteen is not mentioned in the Report. Not only did he corroborate Oswald's visits to Hutchison's store but he also volunteered that "some times there were two women with him," just as Hutchison had testified. Shasteen recognized Oswald as his customer as soon as he saw him on television on November 22; he had cut the man's hair and acquired more than casual familiarity with his face. Moreover, on one occasion Shasteen had admired his customer's lounging slippers, and the customer had volunteered that he bought them for $1.50 in Mexico (10H 311)—a further point of identity with Oswald, who had visited Mexico City at the end of September that year. Was it the real Oswald who was seen by Shasteen and Hutchison, once together with a pregnant wife whom they believed to be Marina Oswald? Or was it a different man with a different wife, both of whom resembled their Oswald counterparts? Or was it a man impersonating Oswald, accompanied by a woman impersonating Marina? If it was the real Oswald, who was the source of the check for $189? (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p. 364-5)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Oct 7, 2020 13:02:17 GMT -5
426 New Orleans French Hospital Oswald recordsResearcher John Armstrong, the author of Harvey and Lee, spent the better part of a decade trying to unravel a mystery hypothesized by Richard Popkin in the 1960s: that there were actually two (or possibly more) Lee Oswalds, based on contradictory eyewitness reports that someone named “Lee Oswald” had been noted in locations where the substantiated Lee Oswald could not have been. This theory is beyond the scope of the subject at hand; however, Armstrong’s research into the identity and history of Lee Harvey Oswald was exhaustive, as evidenced by the massive collection of materials he amassed, now housed at the archives of Page Legislative Library at Baylor University. Within that archive are photocopies of the document which had eluded researchers for decades: Lee Harvey Oswald’s actual birth record. The certified copy, verified by the Parish of Orleans and City of New Orleans, is not really a birth certificate in a traditional sense. It is, in fact, an affidavit attesting to the birth of Lee Oswald, recording the presence of Lee’s uncle, Harvey Oswald, before J.M. Batchelor, Chairman of the Board of Health for Orleans Parish. According to the document, Harvey appeared before the board on October 25, 1939, and confirmed Lee’s birth at the French Hospital on October 19. The document was endorsed by Batchelor and witnessed by two citizens of the parish, G. H. Giroux (parish recorder) and H. J. Prudhomme. Armstrong contacted an official of the Bureau of Vital Statistics of Louisiana concerning this birth record who stated that “this form is used for births occurring outside a hospital and without a midwife” and that “a French Hospital official should have executed a regular birth certificate” under the circumstances of Lee’s birth. The reasons for this apparent anomaly are unknown, especially curious because the French Hospital at this time had been functioning as a privately funded maternity hospital, which should have made such documentation a routine matter. (Research indicates that the hospital records were destroyed at some point after the hospital closed in 1951.) In any case, Harvey Oswald, a man who Lee evidently knew nothing about, was the only individual who officially vouched for Lee’s birth, for his mother (or any hospital employee) was not required to endorse any record and the other witnesses on the certificate seem to have been parish employees, rather than actual witnesses to the event. The exact nature of the family relationship between Marguerite Oswald and her brother-in-law, Harvey, is unclear, although, according to the marriage certificate, it appears that Harvey witnessed the wedding between Marguerite and the late Robert Oswald in 1933. The next day, October 26, a notice appeared in the New Orleans Times Picayune, announcing the birth of a son to the late Robert E. L. Oswald at the French Hospital. ( Zach Jendro, The Possessions of Lee Harvey Oswald: Identification Documents, Debunked blog, 2014) The French Hospital in New Orleans where Lee Harvey Oswald was born
|
|