|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 9, 2020 9:03:08 GMT -5
337 Instructions for / report of search of 'Oswald' busThere is reason to wonder whether either Mrs. Bledsoe or Oswald was on the bus, together or separately. Indeed, if we tend to believe that Oswald was on the bus, it is more because of Milton Jones's report about the police boarding party than because of the incomplete and inconsistent evidence presented by the Commission. (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p. 81, 1967) JONES advised that the bus proceeded in the direction of Houston Street and, approximately four blocks before Houston Street, was completely stopped by traffic which was backed up in this area . He recalled that at this time a policeman notified the driver the President had been shot and he told the driver no one was to leave the bus until police officers had talked to each passenger. JONES estimated that there ware about fifteen people on the bus at this time and two police officers boarded the bus and checked each passenger to see if any were carrying firearms. JONES advised that before the bus was stopped the driver made his last passenger pickup approximately six blocks before Houston Street, that one was a blonde-haired woman and the other was a dark-haired man. He said the man sat in the seat directly behind him and the woman occupied the seat further to the rear of the bus. JONES advised that when the bus was stopped by traffic,and prior to the appearance of the police offices, the woman left the bus by the rear door and the man who was sitting behind him left the bus by the front door while it was held up in the middle of the block . (CE 2641, FBI interview of Roy Milton Jones, March 30, 1964) McWatters bus photographed by Stuart Reed as it approaches the TSBD after the shooting. Roy Milton Jones is on this bus and claims the bus was searched by police shortly after this photo was taken.
But there is a more serious conflict. The driver testified that traffic was at a standstill, but that the police had allowed buses to proceed while holding up passenger cars. Milton Jones, however, gave the surprising report that two policemen had boarded the bus and searched the passengers, just after Oswald had left. If that is true, it suggests the following implications: (1) McWatters, whose testimony betrays the fact that he permitted the police to influence him improperly (2H 277), may have withheld from the Commission the important information that the police had searched his bus. (2) Police officials were unaware of or suppressed information about the search of the bus by policemen. (3) Instructions for such a search, if transmitted on the police radio, have been omitted from the official transcripts of the radio log. (4) The search of a bus on which Oswald had been a passenger, just after he had debarked—and in the absence of city-wide roadblocks or interference with movement of all other vehicles—raises the possibility that the police were pursuing Oswald before his absence from the Book Depository was even noticed. If such a pursuit in fact took place, one would wish to know the identity of the policemen and their reasons for their interest in Oswald—especially considering the fact (discussed in Chapter 13) that two policemen in a patrol car appeared in front of Oswald's rooming house and sounded their horn while he was in his room. The implications of the information obtained from Milton Jones must have been apparent to the Commission when it received the FBI report of April 3, 1964 on the interview with him. Witnesses continued to give testimony for some five months, but the Commission did not call Milton Jones or make any attempt to test his story. They did not even dismiss his statements as "mistaken," as they did with so many other witnesses who reported circumstances embarrassing to the official findings; they just ignored the whole thing. (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p.82/83)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 9, 2020 11:39:27 GMT -5
338 One additional Reed photographSee also:73 Several Jim McCammon photographs and negativesReed. S. L.: PC: Stuart L. Reed, who snapped fourteen photographs of the motorcade two blocks away from Dealey Plaza and the arrest of Oswald at the Texas Theater. According to Reed, one additional photograph was withheld and retained by the FBI. Deceased. ( Weisberg photographers) Credit: Denis Morissette
Stuart Reed passed away in 1979.
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 11, 2020 13:28:02 GMT -5
339 Detective Dhority's 11-22-1963 description of the rifleRelated:130 FBI report with Seymore Weitzman's detailed description of the rifle found132 One 7.65 Mauser247 One 30.06 rifle investigated by the FBIAbout 9,00 PM, Capt. J. W. Fritz gave me three spent 6.5 rifle shells and advised mo to take them to the Crime Lab to Lt . Day and return one of them back to him. Lt. Day examined all the shells for prints and put one in an envelope that I returned to Capt. Fritz. While I was at the Crime Lab, Lt. Day showed me a 6.5 rifle, and I wrote a description from the rifle. I returned to the office and was in Capt. Fritz's office when Det. J.B. Hicks, and Pete Barnes made paraffin cast of Lee Harvey Oswald's hands and face. I got off duty about 2:00 AM, November 23, 1963. ( Report of detective C.N. Dhority, WH24 CE2003, p. 195) Charles Nathan Dhority, 1923-2002, holding a dying Oswald's hand
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 12, 2020 12:48:13 GMT -5
340 Lieutenant Day's detailed 11-22-63 description of the rifleRelated:130 FBI report with Seymore Weitzman's detailed description of the rifle found339 Detective Dhority's 11-22-1963 description of the rifleAbove all, the 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano which the Report asserts is the rifle found in the Book Depository was not shown to Weitzman so that he could affirm or deny that it was the same rifle that he discovered on the sixth floor of the Book Depository. This was an elementary and indispensable procedure which a thorough investigation would not have omitted. The failure to obtain such corroboration from Weitzman leaves open the possibility that a substitution of rifles took place, or that a second rifle may have been found at the Book Depository but kept secret. In evaluating that possibility, it should be noted that Lieutenant Day testified that when he took the rifle to the police headquarters on Friday afternoon he dictated a detailed description of the weapon to his secretary (4H 260) but that that document is not included in the Exhibits. A second police officer wrote a description of the rifle at about 9 p.m. on the same day (CE 2003, p. 195), but his report is also omitted from the official documents. Consequently, we do not know the contents of either of those two contemporaneous descriptions of the rifle. It is difficult to understand why those documents were not exhibited in support of the assertions in the Report, since the Warren Commission was certainly aware of widespread suspicion that a Carcano had been substituted for a Mauser actually found in the Book Depository. (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p.100)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 13, 2020 5:10:14 GMT -5
341 An inquiry into the development of the backyard photographs Erasing the Past...DiscussionsRelated: 14 The negatives of Backyard Photos 133A and 133C 45 A color transparency of the backyard photographs 54 NPIC official history The link of the alleged murder weapons with the suspect, although more tenuous than initially portrayed, was publicized as a major breakthrough and helped harden opinion that Oswald was the assassin ahead of his own murder. The presence of radical left wing literature in the photos also helped solidify a portrait of Oswald as a dangerous communist. Curry’s misreading of a newspaper banner - Be Militant instead of The Militant - is indicative of a particular frame of reference, and explains a note jotted by reporter Seth Kantor: “Ask Fritz ... 501 Elm is place that processed photo. What are details of photo (showing gun & Daily Worker head: “Be Militant.”) (Jeff Carter, A new look at the enigma of the Backyard Photographs, Parts 1-3, 2015) The Report does not comment on the question of the place where the photographs were developed. The Hearings and Exhibits provide no information on this point except for a handwritten reminder in a reporter's notebook recording the events following Oswald's arrest: Ask Fritz- 1—Who N.C. preacher who tipped them about the mail-order purchase? 2-501 Elm is place that processed photo. What are details of photo (showing gun & Daily Worker head: "Be Militant")
(Kantor Exhibit No. 3, Vol. XX, p. 376) It is logical to assume that Kantor learned from the police that the photo of Oswald holding the rifle had been processed at 501 Elm. If so, the police have said nothing about this in reports or testimony, and neither the FBI nor the Warren Commission has shown any interest in the question. When were the photographs developed, and by whom, and how were they traced to 501 Elm Street—which is less than a block away from the Book Depository? It should be recalled that on March 31, 1963, the day on which Marina Oswald is said to have taken the photographs, Oswald was still employed at Jaggers-Chiles-Stovall, in the photographic department. According to a coworker: . . . about one month after he started . . . he seemed interested in whether the company would allow him to reproduce his own pictures, and I told him that while they didn't sanction that sort of thing, that people do it now and then. (10H 201) One would think that Oswald—whose parsimony was often emphasized by witnesses who knew him—would have taken advantage of the opportunity to have the photographs developed at no cost to himself. It is true that he was dismissed from this job at the end of the week. Once dismissed, presumably before an opportunity to print the photographs, why should Oswald have taken them to 501 Elm? He could easily have had them developed and printed near his apartment at Oak Cliff. Consequently, the date on which the films were left to be developed assumes some interest, and it is a pity that no inquiry was made by the Commission. (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p.202) Coïncidence on Elm Street: the place where the backyard photo's were developed, now houses the Sixth Floor Museum's store and café.
501 Elm Street is the Dal-Tex Building. Since the two photos and their corresponding negatives were said to be found inside a “packet”, perhaps that packet had an identifier listing this address. Did the Dal-Tex building have a tenant in 1963 which could process photos in the fashion associated with the originally discovered backyard photos? (Jeff Carter, A new look at the enigma of the Backyard Photographs, Parts 1-3, 2015)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 13, 2020 13:05:59 GMT -5
342 CIA op files on Bradley Earl AyersAyers was based at JM/WAVE where he worked with members of anti-Castro groups like Alpha 66 and took part in Operation Mongoose. Gaeton Fonzi claims that Ayers worked closely with Johnny Roselli in attempts to assassinate Fidel Castro. In his book, The War That Never Was (1976), Ayers claimed he trained small teams of commandoes "to infiltrate Cuba, reach human targets, and assassinate them. Anyone in a senior position in government was fair game, and it reached down to the provincial heads, police chiefs and so on. But the principal target, we knew, was Castro - there was no secret about that amongst our people." (...) In a letter sent to John R. Tunheim in 1994, Bradley Ayers claimed that nine people based at JM/WAVE "have intimate operational knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the assassination" of John F. Kennedy. Ayers named Theodore Shackley, Grayston Lynch, Felix Rodriguez, Thomas Clines, Gordon Campbell, David Morales, Rip Robertson, Edward Roderick and Tony Sforza as the men who had this information. Bradley Ayers was interviewed by Jeremy Gunn of the Assassination Records Review Board in May, 1995. According to Gunn: “Ayers claims to have found in the course of his private investigative work, a credible witness who can put David Morales inside the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on the night of June 5, 1968 (RFK’s assassination)." In 2006 Bradley Ayers published The Zenith Secret: A CIA Insider Exposes the Secret War Against Cuba and the Plot that Killed the Kennedy Brothers. ( Spartacus Educational)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 14, 2020 12:40:17 GMT -5
343 The identity of the honking policemen
Related?164 Emergency phone calls about stabbing at 10th & Marsalis166 The identity of the officer who found the Westbrook jacket321 The identity of the parking lot police officerEarlene Roberts 1905-1966MRS. ROBERTS. Right direct in front of that door there was a police car stopped and honked. I had worked for some policemen and sometimes they come by and tell me something that maybe the wives would want me to know, and I thought it was them, and I just glanced out and saw the number, and I said, "Oh, that's not their car," for I knew their car. BALL. You mean, it was not the car of the policemen you knew? MRS. ROBERTS. It wasn't the police car I knew, because their number was 170 and it wasn't 170 and I ignored it. BALL. And who was in the car? MRS. ROBERTS. I don't know;.I didn't pay any attention to it after I noticed it wasn't them-I didn't. (...) BALL. On the 29th of November, Special Agents Will Griffin and James Kennedy of the Federal Bureau of Investigation interviewed you and you told them that after Oswald bad entered his room about 1 p.m. on November 22, 1963, you looked out the front window and saw police car No. 207. MRS. ROBERTS. No. 107. BALL. Is that the number? MRS. ROBERTS. Yes-I remembered it. I don't know where I got that 106-207. Anyway, I knew it wasn't 170. BALL. And you say that there were two uniformed policemen in the car? MRS. ROBERTS. Yes, and it was in a black car. It wasn't an accident squad car at all. BALL. Were there two uniformed policemen in the car? MRS. ROBERTS. Oh, yes. BALL. And one of the officers sounded the horn? MRS. ROBERTS. Just kind of a "tit-tit"-twice. ( Testimony of Mrs. Earlene Roberts, April 8, 1964) 1026 North Beckley (right) in more recent timesThen there is a matter of time and a strange incident at Oswald's lodging. Earlene Roberts, Oswald's landlady, told the Warren Commission she was watching television coverage of the assassination about 1 p.m. when Oswald—who had been registered at the rooming house as O. H. Lee—hurried in and went to his room. She said next a Dallas police car pulled up in front of her house and honked. She explained: "I had worked for some policemen and sometimes they come by ... I just glanced out, saw the number [on the car] ... It wasn't the police car I knew . . . and I ignored it. . . ." She said the police car was directly in front of her home when the driver sounded the horn, like "tit-tit." She said the car then "... just eased on . . . and they just went around the corner that way." According to Roberts, there were two uniformed policemen in the car, most unusual since daytime patrols in that area of the city were limited to one officer—such as Tippit. She could not recall the number of the car precisely, but said she did recall that the first two numbers of a possible three-digit combination were a 1 and a 0. Tippit was driving car No. 10 that day and Tippit failed to respond to a dispatcher call at the approximate time of the police-car incident. Immediately following the police-car episode, Roberts said Oswald came out of his room and left hurriedly, zipping up a jacket. She said he left her house three or four minutes after 1 p.m. Roberts said she looked out of the window and last saw Oswald standing at a nearby bus stop. (Jim Marrs, Crossfire)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 15, 2020 10:55:42 GMT -5
344 Further inquiries into the mysteries of Johnson Exhibit 7 Related:8 The intact version of the Walker surveillance photo12 The identity of the reporter asking the Walker-question on 23-11-1963 48 The handwritten draft of the 'Comrade Kostin' letter to the Soviet Embassy77 File cabinet containing, “records that appeared to be names and activities of Cuban sympathizers”274 One Baltimore ledgerA macabre postscript to the arrest and murder of Oswald was the letter* delivered to Arnold Johnson, an official of the Communist Party, a week after the assassination. The letter was from Oswald. It was postmarked November 1, 1963—exactly four weeks before it arrived at Johnson's address in New York City. Oswald wrote in the letter that he had attended a right-wing meeting at which General Walker made a speech, and then a meeting of the American Civil Liberties Union, which he seemed to be planning to "infiltrate" in order to correct its moderate position. Johnson, photographed in 1953Johnson, quite justifiably, considered the four-week delay in the delivery of the letter to be "beyond all normal procedure." The lateness, it should be noted, covered a period of three weeks before Oswald's arrest and cannot be attributed to his sudden notoriety on November 22. Johnson testified further that there was . . . something odd about the whole letter. . . . For instance, you have a different kind of ink in two places here. It seems that way to me. But that's pretty hard to say with modern pens. The way he signs his name and the way—that could be a problem, because he didn't always sign it the same. . . . I would just as soon leave that to a handwriting expert. . . . It may be worthwhile to check it with a handwriting expert. . . . (10H 103-105)
Rankin, who deposed the witness, was not taking advice from so tainted a source. There is no indication that the letter was submitted to handwriting analysis or that any inquiry was made into the four-week delay in its transit. (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p.314/5) * Johnson Exhibit 7
Page one of the letter
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 17, 2020 10:53:27 GMT -5
345 What Tom Howard knew
Related: 295 What captain Martin knew Detective H. L. McGee, another of Ruby's acquaintances, who made the following report on November 24, 1963: I had stationed myself in the general area in front of the information desk to await the transfer. While I was in this area, the only person I noticed come into the building from either the Commerce Street or Harwood Street doors was Attorney Tom Howard. He came in through the Harwood Street entrance and walked up to the jail office window. At this time Oswald was brought off the jail elevator and Tom Howard turned away from the window and went back toward the Harwood Street door. He waved at me as he went by and said, "That's all I wanted to see." Shortly after that I heard a shot and someone said, "Oh." I did not see the shooting. (CE 2002, p. 135) Not only McGee but Tom Howard, who was Ruby's lawyer, should have been asked to testify about this curious incident. Now it is too late to ask Tom Howard why he was at the jail office just as his client was about to commit murder— Howard died in the spring of 1965. (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p . 425-6)
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Apr 17, 2020 13:53:59 GMT -5
346 Harry Olsen's mysterious motorcycle policeman Related: 166 The identity of the officer who found the Westbrook jacket Tippit did not reply to the 1 p.m. signal. Where was he? Why didn't he answer? Let us look at the testimony of Dallas policeman Harry Olsen, who was a casual friend of Jack Ruby and boy friend of Kay Coleman, a stripper at Ruby's Carousel Club. Olsen's account of his whereabouts at the time of the assassination is extremely interesting. He told Commission Counsel Arlen Specter, who deposed him on August 6, 1964, that he had been off duty on the day of the assassination and had agreed to substitute on a moonlighting job for a motor cycle policeman assigned to the motorcade. The job was to guard an estate in the absence of its owners. Olsen did not remember the name of the motorcycle policeman; there is no indication that the Commission attempted to establish his identity. Where was the estate? Olsen said it was on Eighth Street in Oak Cliff, about two blocks from the freeway—that is, at or very near Lancaster and Eighth, the location from which Tippit supposedly had reported at 12:54. Where was Olsen at that hour? He testified that he had learned that the President had been shot when he answered a phone call for the absent owner of the estate; he had then gone outside and exchanged comments about the tragedy with passersby. (14H 629) Olsen, then, was in the right place at the right time to encounter Tippit with whom he admittedly was acquainted—if Tippit was actually at Lancaster and Eighth. Arlen Specter seemed unaware of the import of Olsen's testimony. He did not ask Olsen if he had seen or spoken to Tippit, perhaps at one o'clock (when Tippit failed to answer the dispatcher's signal). (Sylvia Meagher, Accessories after the fact, p. 263-4) One police officer who rode a motorcycle is the elusive John R. Mackey, who, according to Larry Harris, was the mysterious agent #279 who recovered the in a parking lot behind a service station, after the murder of JD Tippit. ( Thanks to Tom Sorensen for finding his name on this list.)
|
|