Post by Michael Capasse on Sept 16, 2018 21:19:52 GMT -5
Radio Logs & Transcripts
"Did you get that?"
There are three different and contradictory versions of DPD radio logs.
The WC accepted 2 obviously doctored versions before pretending to get a complete one.
And that did not happen until the investigation was just about over.
March 1964
The 1st version was given to the WC. It is Exhibit 705.
The DPD portion takes up 104 pages. It was made available by Inspector Sawyer.
There is a lack of name identification for many of the code numbers.
April 8, 1964
"Sawyer Exhibit A and B" is only 12 pages and accepted without question.
The version was also prepared with no names but at some point the names were added in longhand. It also misidentified some and failed to identify others.
August 11, 1964
In response to a WC request the FBI supplied the final version. It is Exhibit 1974.
216 pages yet incomplete by the WCs design.
They limited the periods to be covered to only nine hours for the three-days.
The WC was almost finished with its work.
The Warren Commission published three versions of the words that followed the citizen’s question, "Did you get that?"
Sawyer Exhibit A of December 3, 1963, reported that the dispatcher who conversed with the citizen broadcast the words, "Signal 19 involving a police officer, 510 E. Jefferson."
CE 705 attributed the evolving message to an unknown voice who said "a police officer, 510 E. Jefferson."
During August of 1964 the third version attempted to reconcile the contradictory reports of the previous two transcripts.
They attributed the statement, "a police officer, 510 East Jefferson" to the citizen that was repeated by the Dispatcher as "Signal 19, involving a police officer, 510 East Jefferson." The Warren Commission published this transcript within CE 1974.
The citizen said seven words, "Hello police operator did you get that?" during the interval that CE 1974 claimed the dispatcher said the three words, "Signal 19, involving."
However, both messages began simultaneously so the claim of CE 1974 strongly suggests that they transcribed a mutated record of the dictabelt.
Why is T F Bowley written out of the official story when in fact he was the one to get thru to Dispatch.."There's been a shooting out here." was T.F. Bowley, not Domingo Benevides
Why should Sawyer Exhibit have this unchallenged false statement "...this is the last radio transmission between officer Tippit and the dispatcher... " added as a comment?
Dispatch had tried to radio Tippit at 1:00p
Why should Tippit's broadcast of his precise location at 12:45 PM be included in Exhibit 1974 "I'm at Kiset and Bonnyview" and have been omitted in the earlier version Exhibit 705?
Why did the dispatcher give many wrong addresses to police cars going to the scene of the Tippit murder when the first information he got was correct?
Why is there no explanation of the disposition of suspects and cars and trucks some with rifles, some arrested, at least one in the building across Houston?
..all are in these logs
Why did Exhibit 705 not identify call 550/2?
Sawyer's Exhibit identifies the call as Capt. Westbrook / Exhibit 1974 identifies it as Sgt. Hill
"Did you get that?"
There are three different and contradictory versions of DPD radio logs.
The WC accepted 2 obviously doctored versions before pretending to get a complete one.
And that did not happen until the investigation was just about over.
March 1964
The 1st version was given to the WC. It is Exhibit 705.
The DPD portion takes up 104 pages. It was made available by Inspector Sawyer.
There is a lack of name identification for many of the code numbers.
April 8, 1964
"Sawyer Exhibit A and B" is only 12 pages and accepted without question.
The version was also prepared with no names but at some point the names were added in longhand. It also misidentified some and failed to identify others.
August 11, 1964
In response to a WC request the FBI supplied the final version. It is Exhibit 1974.
216 pages yet incomplete by the WCs design.
They limited the periods to be covered to only nine hours for the three-days.
The WC was almost finished with its work.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sawyer Exhibit A of December 3, 1963, reported that the dispatcher who conversed with the citizen broadcast the words, "Signal 19 involving a police officer, 510 E. Jefferson."
CE 705 attributed the evolving message to an unknown voice who said "a police officer, 510 E. Jefferson."
During August of 1964 the third version attempted to reconcile the contradictory reports of the previous two transcripts.
They attributed the statement, "a police officer, 510 East Jefferson" to the citizen that was repeated by the Dispatcher as "Signal 19, involving a police officer, 510 East Jefferson." The Warren Commission published this transcript within CE 1974.
The citizen said seven words, "Hello police operator did you get that?" during the interval that CE 1974 claimed the dispatcher said the three words, "Signal 19, involving."
However, both messages began simultaneously so the claim of CE 1974 strongly suggests that they transcribed a mutated record of the dictabelt.
Why is T F Bowley written out of the official story when in fact he was the one to get thru to Dispatch.."There's been a shooting out here." was T.F. Bowley, not Domingo Benevides
Why should Sawyer Exhibit have this unchallenged false statement "...this is the last radio transmission between officer Tippit and the dispatcher... " added as a comment?
Dispatch had tried to radio Tippit at 1:00p
Why should Tippit's broadcast of his precise location at 12:45 PM be included in Exhibit 1974 "I'm at Kiset and Bonnyview" and have been omitted in the earlier version Exhibit 705?
Why did the dispatcher give many wrong addresses to police cars going to the scene of the Tippit murder when the first information he got was correct?
Why is there no explanation of the disposition of suspects and cars and trucks some with rifles, some arrested, at least one in the building across Houston?
..all are in these logs
Why did Exhibit 705 not identify call 550/2?
Sawyer's Exhibit identifies the call as Capt. Westbrook / Exhibit 1974 identifies it as Sgt. Hill
None of the logs ever did identify 492 or 279
