|
Post by Tom Sorensen on Jun 27, 2019 7:55:02 GMT -5
Arjan, I've gone over your entry 146 several times and still don't get what's going on here... Exhibit 3 is described to be a copy of 3-A (Volume XIX, page 404) which MAY pass as a documents in it's own right (if that was the intention) but any fool can see that Exhibit 3 (Volume XIX, page 403) is a cut-and-paste job so what were the commissioners up to? Also, from the excerpt, this part confuses me (my emphasis): The top horizontal portion of the card (perhaps 1") was cut from the original document and published at the bottom of page 403 in Volume 19 (Cunningham Exhibit No.3). But the cut above "P.O" indicate the portion displayed was the middle part of the card and both top AND bottom parts were discarded. Your thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Arjan Hut on Jun 28, 2019 14:35:29 GMT -5
It ís confusing. I had this item #146 lined up for the first edition of Erasing the Past on another forum, but didn't use it. Yet I forgot why I didn't.
I've included it because Armstrong claims the bottom part of the IC-Card was destroyed.
Armstrong also claimed LHO's W-2's were all falsified, but I've read Doug Horne's response to that since and in stead have added #141 Lee Harvey Oswald's 1959, 3rd quarter, U.S. Marine Corps earnings and #142 Oswald's 1957 tax return, as mentioned in Horne's article.
You're right about the top and the bottom part being discarded and I've interpreted that as Armstrong insinuating that both parts contained writing/information in conflict with the WC narrative.
|
|
|
Post by Tom Sorensen on Apr 25, 2020 2:26:55 GMT -5
Further to the faking of the Cunningham Exhibits:
|
|