|
Post by Arjan Hut on May 30, 2019 6:40:04 GMT -5
Gerald Campeau in the Mice Fighting Gorillas-Facebookgroup posted a link to the FBI-report in the National Archives that I think Sylvia Maegher was referring to. I'm keeping the entry in the Erasing the Past list, just striking it through to indicate that this item is no longer lost or being withheld. Link: FBI REPORT IN THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES"Mr. WEITZMAN described the rifle which was found as a 7.65 caliber Mauser bolt-action rifle, which loads from a five shot clip which is locked on the underside of the receiver forward of the trigger guard. The metal parts of this rifle were of a gun metal color, gray or blue, and the rear portion of the bolt was visibly worn. The wooden portions of this rifle were a dark brown in color and of rough wood, apparently having been used or damaged to considerable extent. This rifle was equipped with a four-power 18 scope of apparent Japanese manufacture. It was also equipped with a thick brown-black leather bandolier type sling." (From the FBI report)
|
|
|
Post by Tom Sorensen on May 31, 2019 13:20:43 GMT -5
Sneaky BALL....note how he only provides an actual quote from the affidavit:
Mr. BALL - In this statement, it says Captain Fritz took charge of the rifle and ejected one live round from the chamber. Mr. WEITZMAN - Yes, sir.
So who handled the rifle prior to Fritz taking charge? This is what the 11/23 FBI report (Arjan link) says:
"After he had observed this rifle to the extent described above, Captain FRITZ appeared and took the rifle from him."
This indicates that Weitzman handled the rifle prior to Fritz' arrival. That makes sense considering the amount of detail Weitzman provided in the report and which BALL actually quotes. Clearly BALL if fully aware of this report so how come he allowed Weitzman to perjure himself during the questioning?
Mr. WEITZMAN - And at the time I looked at it, I believe I said it was 2.5 scope on it and I believe I said it was a Weaver but it wasn't; it turned out to be anything but a Weaver, but that was at a glance. Mr. BALL - Didn't you, when you went over to the railroad yard, talk to some yardman?
BALL quickly lost interest.... so why would the FBI report state it was a 4/18 scope of Japanese manufacture when Weitzman believed it was a Weaver and why did BALL not address this bizarre mistake when, as the report suggests, Weitzman handled the rifle and says nothing about glancing?
Was a Mauser with a Weaver scope initially found and that FBI report later fixed to make Weitzman look like a fool?
Further, in the 11/24 FBI report (ONE day later) all details of the Mauser and scope have disappeared and regarding the handling of the rifle this is reported:
"He advised they did not touch the rifle, but immediately showed it to Captain FRITZ of the Dallas Police Department, and from what he could observe, the rifle looked like a 7.65 German Mauser."
I wouldn't surprise me if a Mauser with a Weaver scope was initially found in that building.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Capasse on May 31, 2019 14:03:28 GMT -5
So who handled the rifle prior to Fritz taking charge? This is what the 11/23 FBI report (Arjan link) says:
"After he had observed this rifle to the extent described above, Captain FRITZ appeared and took the rifle from him." Good catch Tom. the Mauser question remains. I had ignored this issue for a long time, I thought it was settled. I started picking it up again in the '90s after the London trial. It can't be found, it can't be proven, but it is an indicator of a coverup and it is so ridiculously navigated.
2 men, wrote 7.65 Mauser to the FBI, 5 times for 4 days. 7.65 !
Professional law enforcement, trained in identifying weapons continued to write this in sworn reports accepted by the FBI (that held the gun.)
|
|