|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Sept 3, 2018 17:04:29 GMT -5
When I read this, my mouth covered nearly with astonishment !!!!
Purely speculation.
I think 1 point less out of 53.
Since when can Bugliosi look through the Stemmons traffic shield and see what the sitting position is of the president and JBC? ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Sept 3, 2018 17:38:58 GMT -5
  Compare the Data with the diagram and the data frm Zapruder frame WC reanactment!! |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Capasse on Sept 4, 2018 7:32:41 GMT -5
HI Paul - so let's be clear...Mr. Bugliosi says the non fatal bullet that wounded both the GOV and the Pres. hit both men JUST before z frame 210. (remember that's what Mr. Willis said too - Dan Rather says when his hand went to his hairline - about z204)
BUT then we have the modern WC defenders that say the men were hit at about z frame 222, - that's more than a second later !!!
Making it clear to anyone reading this now - we still don't know -there is no way to tell exactly when these men were shot - not by Bugliosi or anyone, because there are signs of tampering to the z film - mainly frames cut - blur - tilt - and speed variables - in the end there is only on shot we can identify in the Zapruder film that is at frame z313.
Reactions at frames later than z 210 are from additional shots.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Sept 4, 2018 13:09:06 GMT -5
HI Paul - so let's be clear...Mr. Bugliosi says the non fatal bullet that wounded both the GOV and the Pres. hit both men JUST before z frame 210. (remember that's what Mr. Willis said too - Dan Rather says when his hand went to his hairline - about z204)
BUT then we have the modern WC defenders that say the men were hit at about z frame 222, - that's more than a second later !!!
Making it clear to anyone reading this now - we still don't know -there is no way to tell exactly when these men were shot - not by Bugliosi or anyone, because there are signs of tampering to the z film - mainly frames cut - blur - tilt - and speed variables - in the end there is only on shot we can identify in the Zapruder film that is at frame z313.
Reactions at frames later than z 210 are from additional shots.
Thanks Michael!
What kind of evidence they have for a shot @ Z-222?
And what is the result from that shot according the trajectory?BW Paul. |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Capasse on Sept 4, 2018 13:55:53 GMT -5
Thanx Paul -
This is the frame they say GOVs lapel puffs out 
even worse; this is the frame they say both men line up
notice the GOVs wrist is all wrong
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Sept 4, 2018 14:50:10 GMT -5
Thanx Paul -
This is the frame they say GOVs lapel puffs out
even worse; this is the frame they say both men line up
notice the GOVs wrist is all wrongI have another explanation.
1. Bad film quality.
2. Non stabilized frames, see the difference.
How can a camera with 18 frames/sec recording a lapel puff out when they needed hyspeed camera's (35000 frames a sec) to follow a bullet?
Lapel flip, this might by caused by movement. (turning).
 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2018 10:23:57 GMT -5
Hi Michael:
Here's a YouTube videoclip about attorney Vincent Bugliosi.
Keep in mind that, not unlike spooks, attorneys are trained to lie (in debate clubs, mock depositions, etc.). See this movie, as a perfect illustration:
-Ramon JFK Numbers
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Jan 7, 2019 8:29:39 GMT -5
 Compare with Bugliosi! |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Ernst on Jan 7, 2019 9:12:22 GMT -5
 And another one!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Capasse on Jan 7, 2019 10:00:20 GMT -5
Compare with Bugliosi! HI Paul - so what are we looking at here?
Is this what the trajectory of the bullet should be at z210?
It doesn't line up to anybody.
|
|
?
